Skip to main content
guest
Join
|
Help
|
Sign In
WLPCSFrancais
Home
guest
|
Join
|
Help
|
Sign In
Wiki Home
Recent Changes
Pages and Files
Members
Home
COURS
4ème année (8th grade)
4e annonces
4e calendrier
4e devoirs
4e documents
4e projets
Quelle année?!??
RECHERCHER
Dictionnaires
ETUDIER
Flashcards
Vocab d'apprentissage
EVALUER
Grading rubrics
CONTACTER
Voulez-vous parler
à Mme Aredas?
earedas@latinpcs.org
513.833.7197
Plan du site
Rubriques
Edit
0
4
…
0
Tags
No tags
Notify
RSS
Backlinks
Source
Print
Export (PDF)
Voilà les rubriques avec lesquelles je vous évalue. Comme d'habitude, si vous avez des questions, il suffit de me contacter.
Table of Contents
General Grading Rubric
Socratic Discussion Reflection Rubric
Think-tac-toe Rubric for Projects
Here are the grading rubrics with which I evaluate you. As usual, if you have any questions, just contact me.
General Grading Rubric
Participation
15%
Tests and projects
40%
Quizzes
30%
Homework
15%
2010.10.22 grading rubric update.doc
Details
Download
30 KB
Socratic Discussion Reflection Rubric
Must be neat, using complete sentences and proper grammar.
Responses must be thoughtful and coherent, relating to the topic and in-class discussion.
0
2
4
6
8
10
Grammar/ mechanics
Writing has many grammar and mechanical errors making understanding impossible
Writing has many grammar and mechanical errors and understanding is impeded.
Writing has several grammar and mechanical errors; understanding is impeded
Writing has several grammar and mechanical errors but understanding is not impeded
Writing has a few grammar and mechanical errors but understanding is not impeded
Student has an excellent command of grammar and mechanics
Relevance
Off topic and does not refer to in-class discussion/ article
Off topic and lacks reference to in-class discussion / article.
Occasionally on topic and has a few references to in-class discussion/ article.
Mostly on topic with moderate reference to in-class discussion/ article.
On topic and frequently refers to in-class discussion/ article.
On topic with frequent references to in-class discussion/ article that show outstanding comprehension.
Quality
Incoherent, incomplete.
Incoherent and lacking thoughtfulness.
Mostly coherent, but lacking thought.
Mostly coherent, with a moderate amount of thought.
Well-written and thoughtful
Extremely well-written and thoughtful.
Socratic Discussion Rubric.doc
Details
Download
34 KB
Think-tac-toe Rubric for Projects
think-tac-toe.doc
Details
Download
43 KB
Javascript Required
You need to enable Javascript in your browser to edit pages.
help on how to format text
Turn off "Getting Started"
Home
...
Loading...
Table of Contents
Here are the grading rubrics with which I evaluate you. As usual, if you have any questions, just contact me.
General Grading Rubric
Socratic Discussion Reflection Rubric
Think-tac-toe Rubric for Projects